Wednesday 16th July, 2025

It is in the public interest to learn about the sinister side of the BBC that it hates to see being publicised.

All three Lighthouse Associates were officially signed off as medically unfit to attend court. The ongoing attacks—against them personally and Lighthouse as a whole—have borne an unbearable weight. Each of them has reached breaking point under the weight of the coordinated murderous attacks against us over the past four years.

In our update article you can learn more about:

1. The reality of the physical, mental and emotional toll it takes to stand for truth against provably lying and deceiving legacy media institutions like the BBC.
2. The psychopathic and inhumane way that the BBC seeks to destroy lives in the name of so-called ‘public interest’, to violate the human rights of the very people who have funded it over the course of decades.
3. The significant opportunity that this case and trial presents to expose the truth of how tyrannical people and organisations operate in order to maintain their power and influence.
4. What to look out for next in our quest for truth, justice, compensation and reform.

Sunday 6th July, 2025

This case will set crucial and vital precedents for any member of the public seeking to respond to being smeared in the mainstream media.

The core of this trial speaks to every citizen’s right to fair treatment, to protect themselves from abuse, and to seek lawful resolution without fear of being arrested or smeared.

What We’ve Been Fighting For

Lighthouse has consistently demanded something very simple, very clear—and very rarely granted:
– A full and comprehensive right to reply to all claims made by false accusers.
– Not a token line buried at the bottom of a hit piece.
– Not a single sentence offered under the guise of “balance.”
– Not “last words” before a public hanging.
– But a genuine opportunity—equal in reach, time, money, and editorial space—to fully address every accusation, every claim, every insinuation.

This is not just our right. It’s a public right. It is the standard that should underpin journalism in this country—yet the public remains largely unaware that this standard is almost never met. Most people assume “the other side” was heard. They were not. Most people assume “the accused were invited to comment.” Perhaps they were—but rarely on the full list of claims, and certainly not with the same resources to respond.

The Fight for Real Accountability

The truth is, when the BBC or any media organisation sets out to attack, the target is not invited to participate in the investigation. They are invited to comment after the fact—often with little notice, unclear or partial information, and no say over how their words will be edited, framed, or used.

This was the experience of us at Lighthouse. 

This is why we have consistently demanded a live, unedited, real-time interview with the BBC. That’s why we demanded a complete list of claims in order to bring our evidence—not a few cherry-picked allegations used to build a narrative, while the rest are kept hidden to avoid inconvenient truths.

Why It Matters to You

This is not just about Lighthouse. This is about you, your family, your community, your rights. You pay a TV licence fee. You fund the BBC. You fund other public broadcasters and media. You have the right to demand that they inform, not deceive. That they expose truth, not distort it. That they be held to the highest standards—not protected by the lowest.

Every citizen in this country deserves transparency. Every person accused deserves not just a “right to comment,” but a full and comprehensive opportunity to reply in full—with every claim on the table and every answer made available to the public without censorship or spin.

This is what we at Lighthouse have been fighting for. Not just fighting for ourselves, but for every citizen who has ever been lied about, silenced, ignored, or crushed under the weight of a media agenda that refuses to be accountable.

What You Can Do:

1. Follow and Support the Trial

Make a note of the new trial dates: 14th, 15th, and 21st July. Follow the updates and show your support for Kristofer, Sukhraj, and Jatinder as they stand for truth, transparency, and fair treatment for all. Please keep them and their legal team in your prayers.

2. Share This Message

Send this update with friends, family, or anyone who believes in justice and accountability. Help others understand what’s really at stake—not just for Lighthouse, but for every UK citizen.

3. Ask the BBC a Simple Question

If you pay the licence fee, you have a right to ask:

“Why weren’t Lighthouse and others given a full and comprehensive right to reply to every claim?”

Insist on equal editorial space, equal resources, and unedited, real-time response.

Tuesday 1st July, 2025

Above: Lighthouse Associates have been seeking truth, justice, compensation and reform since the BBC’s slanderous broadcast of A Very British Cult in April 2023.

In any functioning democracy, one of the oldest and most peaceful actions a citizen can take is to knock on a neighbour’s door. Whether to talk, to offer help, to share a belief, to make peace, or to seek resolution, it’s a human gesture as old as community itself.

Imagine if you went and knocked on your neighbours house and the next thing you’re being arrested for harassment? What if you had a dispute with your neighbour and you knocked on their door in an attempt to resolve that dispute, potentially as a Christian (with biblical literature), or not, and the next thing you know, you’re faced with 6 police officers and 2 vans and being arrested? Well… be prepared to be shocked and horrified as that is what happened to us here at Lighthouse and our three brothers and why they are appearing at court this Thursday, 3rd July 2025.

The Dangerous ‘Two Visit’ Technicality

Most people don’t know this—but in the UK, you can now be arrested for simply knocking twice on a neighbour’s door. Even if they’re not home, even if you’re acting peacefully, and even if your intention is to resolve a dispute or speak civilly, that second visit can trigger what is quietly becoming known as the “two visit harassment rule.” It’s not a law that’s widely known or debated—it’s a legal technicality being applied arbitrarily and dangerously. Based on subjective feelings alone, someone can claim harassment simply because you knocked more than once. This isn’t protecting the vulnerable; it’s criminalising basic, human, neighbourly communication.

Precedents That Break Society

If this technicality stands, then every dispute between neighbours could require police oversight—because if you knock twice, you risk arrest, regardless of intent or truth. No one we’ve spoken to knew this existed, and it’s barely discussed online. It means cronies can weaponise the police to protect their own or silence their critics, all under the guise of ‘harassment.’ Meanwhile, honest citizens are punished for trying to speak up. We’re all neighbours in this country, and “love your neighbour” doesn’t mean just the one on your street—it means everyone. This isn’t justice. It’s manipulation by those who fear the truth.

Can you imagine a situation where any time someone wants to go and knock on their neighbour’s door, they need their permission or need to have a policeman present when you do so that there’s a third party present so you do not get arrested? These technicalities make it impossible for society to conduct its judicial and civil duties without prosecution.

We’re approaching a critical moment in the UK’s understanding of law, liberty, and the basic rights of its citizens — and must now examine the ultimate truth they are founded upon.